On-Page SEO Analyzer

Audit any page, see every issue ranked by the points a fix recovers, then copy a prompt that tells an AI assistant exactly what to change. Free, no sign up.

Any public page — paste the full URL, or just the domain

Free, no sign up. We only read the public page — nothing is stored on our servers.

How It Works

Paste a URL

Any public page — the audit takes a few seconds.

Read the score

Six weighted perspectives, with every check and its evidence shown.

Copy the fix prompt

Paste it into an AI assistant, apply the changes, then re-audit.

Features

~50 checks across six weighted SEO perspectives

Paste-ready AI fix prompts, split by code vs server config

Detects SSG, SSR, CSR and ISR — with the evidence

Every issue ranked by the points a fix recovers

Broken internal links, robots.txt and sitemap audit

Free, no sign up, no page limit

Built for the audit → fix → re-audit loop

Most SEO checkers stop at the diagnosis. You get a score, a red list, and the job of working out what to actually change. This one is built to close the loop: every failing check carries the specific fix, and those fixes are assembled into prompts you can hand straight to an AI coding assistant.

Issues are separated by where the fix lives. Pre-production items are changes in your application code — meta tags, headings, content, structured data. Post-production items live in hosting, CDN or deploy config — HTTPS, compression, caching, security headers, TTFB. Mixing those two into one list is why SEO reports so often go unactioned; separating them means each prompt goes to whoever can actually apply it.

Fix, reload, re-audit. The score is the feedback signal, and the ranking tells you which fix buys the most improvement for the least work.

The six perspectives and their weights

  • Meta Tags (20%) — title and description length, canonical and whether it self-references, URL quality, noindex, viewport, lang, charset, favicon, hreflang, structured data.
  • Content Quality (20%) — a single H1, heading nesting, word count, image alt coverage, width/height for layout stability, lazy loading, modern image formats, internal and outbound links, broken links, text-to-HTML ratio.
  • Technical / Delivery (20%) — HTTPS, status and redirect chain, compression, Cache-Control, CDN fingerprint, TTFB, HTML weight, robots.txt, XML sitemap, HSTS and security headers.
  • Rendering & Indexability (20%) — how much content exists before JavaScript runs, whether robots.txt blocks crawling, noscript fallback, and edge cache delivery.
  • Keywords & Readability (10%) — Flesch reading ease, generic anchor text, and the keywords and phrases the page actually emphasises.
  • Social Sharing (10%) — og:title, og:description, og:image and twitter:card, with a preview of the share card.

Honest limits

  • The page is fetched without executing JavaScript — the crawler's view. That is the point, not a shortcut: it is exactly why a client-rendered page scores low here.
  • Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS) and paint timings need a real browser, so they are not scored rather than estimated. Use Lighthouse or PageSpeed Insights alongside this.
  • Rendering detection is probabilistic and labelled with its confidence. Uncached SSG is genuinely indistinguishable from fast SSR from the outside.
  • On-page factors only. Backlinks, domain authority and rankings are off-page and nothing on this page claims to measure them.

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Tools